Wide-Awake Flexor Tendon Repair Under Tumescent Injection Flexor Tendon Repair Under Tumescent Injection
Main Article Content
Keywords
flexor tendone injuery, flexor tendone repair, local anasthesia, tumescent anasthesia
Abstract
Background. Flexor tendon injuries are frequent, due to variable hand activities, and the repair is challenging to hand surgeons, especially in zone II, because of the coexistence of two tendons within a tight fibro-osseous tunnel. Flexor tendon repair under tumescent infiltration provides anesthesia and a bloodless field so that no tourniquet or sedation is needed.
Aim of the study. The goal of this study was to identify a surgical adjustment and intraoperative total active movement examination of the repaired tendon so that no gapping is formed, and smooth gliding is obtained, avoiding tendon rupture and producing an optimal range of motion.
Patients and method. From January 2016 to April 2017, 9 patients (17 tendons), with a mean age of 31.8 years, presented within 3 to 14 days of injury to zone I or zone II of their flexor tendons. Tendon repair was done under tumescent infiltration (lidocaine 1% with adrenaline 1:200,000) only, with no tourniquet or sedation, and with an intraoperative total active movement examination.
Result. After 6 months of follow-up, all the patients had an excellent range of motion according to the Boyes outcome scale, and none showed signs of postoperative tendon rupture.
Conclusion. Tumescent infiltration for flexor tendon repair allows intraoperative surgical adjustment and total active movement examination, which will minimize postoperative rupture and adhesion. This procedure will also facilitate the surgeon’s work by eliminating the need for general anesthesia or sedation; however, this procedure is not applicable for children, major trauma, or those who are mentally challenged.
References
2. Nahai F. The art of aesthetic surgery principles and techniques. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2011. p. 78.
3. Chowdhry S et al. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2031-34.
4. Lalonde DH. Wide awake hand surgery. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2016. p. 23.
5. Wung JKF, Peck F. Improving result of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134(6):913e-925e.
6. Wolfe SW. Green’s operative hand surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Churchill, Livingstone; 2011. p. 189.
7. Tang JB. Wide-awake primary flexor tendon repair, tenolysis, and tendon transfer. Clinics Orthop Surg. 2015;7(3):275-81.
8. Higgins A, Lalonde DH, Bell M, McKee D, Lalonde JF. Avoiding flexor tendon repair rupture with intraoperative total active movement examination. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2010 Sep 1;126(3):941-5
9. Tang JB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2005;21:199-210.
10. Peck FH, Kennedy SM, Watson JS, Lees VC. An evaluation of the influence of practitioner-led hand clinics on rupture rate following primary tendon repair in the hand. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:45-49.
11. Boyer MI, Goldfarb CA, Gelberman RH. Recent progress in flexor tendon healing: the modulation of tendon healing with rehabilitation variables. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:80-85.
12. Hunt TR III, Kozin SH, Wiesel SW. Operative technique in hand, wrist and forearm surgery. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011. p. 12.
13. Siemionow MZ, Eisenmann-Klein M. Plastic, and reconstruction. 1st ed. London: Springer; 2010. p. 540.
14. Lalonde D, Martin A. Tumescent local anesthesia for hand surgery: improved results, cost-effectiveness, and wide-awake patient satisfaction. Arch Plast Surg. 2014;41(4):312-16.
15. Klenerman L. The tourniquet manual: principles and practice. 1st ed. London: Springer; 2003. pp. 15,63.